Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro P6000

Place in the ranking	108	54
Place by popularity	not in top-100	92
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.21	56.76
Power efficiency	11.07	15.48
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP102	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,999	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6700 XT has 1248% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2560
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	394.8	413.0
Floating-point processing power	12.63 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	240	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	384 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 432 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync II	no data
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.22

RX 6700 XT 50.45
+28.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15425

RX 6700 XT 19843
+28.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 −40%	154 +40%
1440p	65−70 −29.2%	84 +29.2%
4K	35−40 −40%	49 +40%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	54.54 −1653%	3.11 +1653%
1440p	92.29 −1518%	5.70 +1518%
4K	171.40 −1653%	9.78 +1653%

RX 6700 XT has 1653% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 6700 XT has 1518% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 6700 XT has 1653% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	159 +0%	159 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	119 +0%	119 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	123 +0%	123 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	104 +0%	104 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	342 +0%	342 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	131 +0%	131 +0%
Metro Exodus	150 +0%	150 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	104 +0%	104 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	91 +0%	91 +0%
Dota 2	166 +0%	166 +0%
Far Cry 5	61 +0%	61 +0%
Fortnite	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	281 +0%	281 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	145 +0%	145 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	161 +0%	161 +0%
Metro Exodus	117 +0%	117 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	91 +0%	91 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	82 +0%	82 +0%
Dota 2	139 +0%	139 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240 +0%	240 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	117 +0%	117 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	102 +0%	102 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
World of Tanks	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +0%	54 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +0%	173 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	94 +0%	94 +0%
Metro Exodus	123 +0%	123 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	102 +0%	102 +0%
Metro Exodus	43 +0%	43 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	102 +0%	102 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10 +0%	10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Dota 2	106 +0%	106 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Fortnite	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	93 +0%	93 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 40% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 29% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 40% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.22	50.45
Recency	1 October 2016	3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	230 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.