Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.99
+22.6%

P6000 outperforms RTX 4000 Max-Q by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 4000 Max-Q RTX 4000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.11no data
Power efficiency11.0128.07
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402560
Core clock speed1506 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8220.8
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s416.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.99
+22.6%
RTX 4000 Max-Q 32.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15373
+22.6%
RTX 4000 Max-Q 12539

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+13.6%
88
−13.6%
1440p55−60
+19.6%
46
−19.6%
4K65−70
+16.1%
56
−16.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p59.99no data
1440p109.07no data
4K92.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Elden Ring 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 4000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 20% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 16% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.99 32.62
Recency 1 October 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 22.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
vs
8600 GTS GeForce 8600 GTS
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
GTX 260M GeForce GTX 260M
vs
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
GTX 950 GeForce GTX 950
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
RX 550X Radeon RX 550X
GTX 1070 1070
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh
Tegra X1 GPU Tegra X1 GPU
vs
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 91 vote

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.