GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs Quadro P520

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P520 with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P520
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 18 Watt
5.43

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms P520 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking612309
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.01
Power efficiency20.6813.42
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP108GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 May 2019 (5 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1303 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate35.83111.4
Floating-point processing power1.147 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P520 5.43
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.62
+224%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P520 2092
RTX 3050 4 GB 6788
+224%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−210%
65−70
+210%
4K23
−204%
70−75
+204%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.06
4Kno data2.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−213%
150−160
+213%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−213%
150−160
+213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−213%
150−160
+213%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Hitman 3 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

This is how Quadro P520 and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 210% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 204% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.43 17.62
Recency 23 May 2019 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 90 Watt

Quadro P520 has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 224.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 104 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2592 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.