Radeon 760M vs Quadro P5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.83
+121%

P5000 outperforms 760M by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.70no data
Power efficiency12.5668.01
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104Hawx Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1607 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate277.383.17
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16032
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1127 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5000 32.83
+121%
Radeon 760M 14.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12623
+121%
Radeon 760M 5701

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+216%
31
−216%
1440p40−45
+111%
19
−111%
4K40
+122%
18−20
−122%

Cost per frame, $

1080p25.50no data
1440p62.48no data
4K62.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+160%
25
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+130%
30
−130%
Elden Ring 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+95.8%
45−50
−95.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+242%
19
−242%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+475%
12
−475%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+200%
51
−200%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+105%
40−45
−105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+86.1%
35−40
−86.1%
Valorant 130−140
+122%
55−60
−122%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+95.8%
45−50
−95.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+261%
18
−261%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+667%
9
−667%
Dota 2 100−110
+365%
23
−365%
Elden Ring 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+207%
29
−207%
Fortnite 150−160
+83.1%
80−85
−83.1%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+248%
44
−248%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+215%
34
−215%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+105%
40−45
−105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+72.9%
100−110
−72.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+86.1%
35−40
−86.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
Valorant 130−140
+122%
55−60
−122%
World of Tanks 270−280
+44.3%
190−200
−44.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+95.8%
45−50
−95.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+150%
24−27
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+138%
27−30
−138%
Dota 2 100−110
+102%
50−55
−102%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+61.8%
55−60
−61.8%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+314%
37
−314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+72.9%
100−110
−72.9%
Valorant 130−140
+122%
55−60
−122%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Elden Ring 60−65
+174%
21−24
−174%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+168%
21−24
−168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+33.6%
130−140
−33.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
World of Tanks 210−220
+103%
100−110
−103%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+186%
35−40
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+153%
35−40
−153%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+128%
30−35
−128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+179%
18−20
−179%
Valorant 95−100
+159%
35−40
−159%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Dota 2 60−65
+135%
24−27
−135%
Elden Ring 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+135%
24−27
−135%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+134%
40−45
−134%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+135%
24−27
−135%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Dota 2 60−65
+135%
24−27
−135%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+142%
18−20
−142%
Fortnite 40−45
+159%
16−18
−159%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Valorant 45−50
+206%
16−18
−206%

This is how Quadro P5000 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 216% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 111% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P5000 is 122% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 667% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed Radeon 760M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.83 14.83
Recency 1 October 2016 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 121.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 182 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 214 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.