Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P5000

Place in the ranking	170	210
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.80	no data
Power efficiency	12.57	53.84
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP104	AD107
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2048
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.3	129.6
Floating-point processing power	8.873 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	160	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	98 +22.5%	80−85 −22.5%
4K	40 +33.3%	30−35 −33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	25.50	no data
4K	62.48	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +30%	50−55 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +25.3%	75−80 −25.3%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +30%	50−55 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +27.5%	120−130 −27.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +26.2%	65−70 −26.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +21.8%	55−60 −21.8%
Valorant	130−140 +31%	100−105 −31%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +25.3%	75−80 −25.3%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +30%	50−55 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%
Dota 2	100−110 +25.9%	85−90 −25.9%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +27.1%	70−75 −27.1%
Fortnite	150−160 +26.7%	120−130 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +27.5%	120−130 −27.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 +25.9%	85−90 −25.9%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +26.2%	65−70 −26.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +23.3%	150−160 −23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +21.8%	55−60 −21.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +24.4%	90−95 −24.4%
Valorant	130−140 +31%	100−105 −31%
World of Tanks	270−280 +20.4%	230−240 −20.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +25.3%	75−80 −25.3%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +30%	50−55 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%
Dota 2	100−110 +25.9%	85−90 −25.9%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +27.1%	70−75 −27.1%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +27.5%	120−130 −27.5%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +23.3%	150−160 −23.3%
Valorant	130−140 +31%	100−105 −31%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Dota 2	55−60 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +25%	140−150 −25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
World of Tanks	210−220 +24.1%	170−180 −24.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +22.4%	85−90 −22.4%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +21.3%	75−80 −21.3%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +21.7%	60−65 −21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Valorant	95−100 +28%	75−80 −28%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Dota 2	60−65 +22%	50−55 −22%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +22%	50−55 −22%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +21.2%	85−90 −21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +22%	50−55 −22%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Dota 2	60−65 +22%	50−55 −22%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Fortnite	40−45 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +20.8%	24−27 −20.8%
Valorant	45−50 +22.5%	40−45 −22.5%

This is how Quadro P5000 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P5000 is 23% faster in 1080p
Quadro P5000 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.30	26.91
Recency	1 October 2016	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro P5000

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Iris Plus Graphics 930

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 182 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.