Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
28.31
+20.4%

P5000 outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking177219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.70no data
Power efficiency12.4853.33
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1607 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate277.3129.6
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+24%
75−80
−24%
4K41
+36.7%
30−35
−36.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+25.7%
140−150
−25.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+26.7%
90−95
−26.7%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+25.7%
140−150
−25.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%
Fortnite 140−150
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+26.3%
95−100
−26.3%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+21.3%
80−85
−21.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Valorant 190−200
+20.6%
160−170
−20.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+26.7%
90−95
−26.7%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+25.7%
140−150
−25.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+24.5%
220−230
−24.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Dota 2 130−140
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%
Fortnite 140−150
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+26.3%
95−100
−26.3%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+21.3%
80−85
−21.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+25.9%
85−90
−25.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+22.5%
80−85
−22.5%
Valorant 190−200
+20.6%
160−170
−20.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+26.7%
90−95
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Dota 2 130−140
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+26.3%
95−100
−26.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Valorant 190−200
+20.6%
160−170
−20.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+24.7%
170−180
−24.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Valorant 230−240
+21.1%
190−200
−21.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Valorant 180−190
+22.7%
150−160
−22.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Dota 2 90−95
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

This is how Quadro P5000 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 24% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 37% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.31 23.52
Recency 1 October 2016 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 20.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Quadro 4000M 4000M
vs
HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 520
Quadro 4000M 4000M
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
vs
ION 2 ION 2
Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Graphics 6100
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
Quadro P5000 P5000
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation
GTX 1070 GTX 1070
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
GTX 970 GTX 970
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1050 Ti
vs
NVS 2100M NVS 2100M
GTX 660 Ti GTX 660 Ti
vs
Radeon 550X 550X
GTX 660 Ti GTX 660 Ti
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 930 Iris Plus Graphics 930

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 183 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.