GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4000
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.12
+160%

P4000 outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking198426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.66no data
Power efficiency19.6710.58
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP107B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792640
Core clock speed1202 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate165.859.72
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPS1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4000 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
Display Port1.4no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p190−200
+160%
73
−160%
Full HD68
+47.8%
46
−47.8%
1440p60−65
+150%
24
−150%
4K35−40
+133%
15
−133%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.99no data
1440p13.58no data
4K23.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+195%
21−24
−195%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+110%
51
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+195%
21−24
−195%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+136%
39
−136%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+100%
55
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+143%
46
−143%
Valorant 180−190
+180%
65−70
−180%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+143%
44
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+69.8%
150−160
−69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+195%
21−24
−195%
Dota 2 130−140
+4%
126
−4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+156%
36
−156%
Fortnite 130−140
+159%
51
−159%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+112%
52
−112%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+138%
42
−138%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+237%
19
−237%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+173%
41
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+97.4%
39
−97.4%
Valorant 180−190
+180%
65−70
−180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+189%
37
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+195%
21−24
−195%
Dota 2 130−140
+13.9%
115
−13.9%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+179%
33
−179%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+197%
37
−197%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+286%
29
−286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+86.4%
22
−86.4%
Valorant 180−190
+180%
65−70
−180%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+238%
39
−238%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+138%
80−85
−138%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+231%
16−18
−231%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+255%
11
−255%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%
Valorant 220−230
+176%
80−85
−176%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+196%
26
−196%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+214%
21
−214%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+188%
26
−188%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+176%
25
−176%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+243%
7
−243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+231%
12−14
−231%
Valorant 160−170
+178%
60−65
−178%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+238%
13
−238%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Dota 2 85−90
+162%
34
−162%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+209%
11
−209%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+233%
15
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+167%
12
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+220%
10
−220%

This is how Quadro P4000 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4000 is 160% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P4000 is 48% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4000 is 150% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4000 is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 286% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4000 is ahead in 37 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.12 11.57
Recency 6 February 2017 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4000 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P4000 has a 160.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4
vs
GTX 960 GTX 960
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
GTX 1070 GDDR5X GTX 1070 GDDR5X
Graphics 448SP Radeon Graphics 448SP
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
GTX 1080 GTX 1080
UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 617
vs
GTX 460 GTX 460
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
vs
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
M2000M Quadro M2000M
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
R9 270 R9 270
ATI HD 5570 Radeon HD 5570
vs
R7 M360 R7 M360

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 313 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1323 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.