Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	319	312
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.62	24.19
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	896
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	765 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	75.60
Floating-point processing power	3.11 TFLOPS	2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	80	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.81

T1000 Max-Q 17.35
+3.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6484

T1000 Max-Q 6695
+3.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
4K	29 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+14.8%

27−30

−14.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +10.5%	55−60 −10.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +9.8%	40−45 −9.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Hitman 3	35−40 +15.2%	30−35 −15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +9.3%	85−90 −9.3%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +12.3%	55−60 −12.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +10.5%	55−60 −10.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +9.8%	40−45 −9.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Hitman 3	35−40 +15.2%	30−35 −15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +9.3%	85−90 −9.3%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +12.3%	55−60 −12.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	81 +103%	40−45 −103%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +9.8%	40−45 −9.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Hitman 3	35−40 +15.2%	30−35 −15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +9.3%	85−90 −9.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +12.3%	55−60 −12.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+10.6%

45−50

−10.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +10%	20−22 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +13.8%	90−95 −13.8%
Hitman 3	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +12.5%	30−35 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +14.7%	30−35 −14.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +9.5%	100−110 −9.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+10.3%

27−30

−10.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +11.8%	16−18 −11.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Hitman 3	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +12.4%	85−90 −12.4%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+13.3%

14−16

−13.3%

This is how P3000 Mobile and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is 3% faster in 1080p
P3000 Mobile is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 103% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)
T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.81	17.35
Recency	11 January 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 3.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro T1000 Max-Q.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.