Quadro M620 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro M620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.82
+132%

P3000 Mobile outperforms M620 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking318535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.5316.71
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP104GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed1088 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz977 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate97.2031.26
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.41.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Stereo++
Mosaic++
nView Display Management++
Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.15.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.82
+132%
Quadro M620 7.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6491
+132%
Quadro M620 2794

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P3000 Mobile 12105
+218%
Quadro M620 3801

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P3000 Mobile 33390
+93.7%
Quadro M620 17237

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P3000 Mobile 9256
+196%
Quadro M620 3130

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P3000 Mobile 63332
+186%
Quadro M620 22120

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P3000 Mobile 2864
+232%
Quadro M620 862

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

P3000 Mobile 68
+169%
Quadro M620 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

P3000 Mobile 107
+90.6%
Quadro M620 56

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

P3000 Mobile 73
+164%
Quadro M620 28

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

P3000 Mobile 97
+201%
Quadro M620 32

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

P3000 Mobile 87
+153%
Quadro M620 34

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

P3000 Mobile 30
+173%
Quadro M620 11

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

P3000 Mobile 55
+171%
Quadro M620 20

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

P3000 Mobile 8
+1183%
Quadro M620 1

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

P3000 Mobile 55
+171%
Quadro M620 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

P3000 Mobile 68
+169%
Quadro M620 25

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

P3000 Mobile 97
+201%
Quadro M620 32

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

P3000 Mobile 107
+90.6%
Quadro M620 56

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

P3000 Mobile 73
+164%
Quadro M620 28

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

P3000 Mobile 87
+153%
Quadro M620 34

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

P3000 Mobile 30
+173%
Quadro M620 11

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

P3000 Mobile 7.7
+1183%
Quadro M620 0.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+167%
24
−167%
4K31
+210%
10
−210%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Hitman 3 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+119%
40−45
−119%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+219%
21−24
−219%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+66.7%
50−55
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Hitman 3 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+119%
40−45
−119%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+219%
21−24
−219%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+30.6%
62
−30.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+66.7%
50−55
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Hitman 3 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+119%
40−45
−119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+230%
10
−230%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+66.7%
50−55
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+312%
24−27
−312%
Hitman 3 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+150%
45−50
−150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Hitman 3 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+450%
4−5
−450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Quadro M620 compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 167% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 210% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P3000 Mobile surpassed Quadro M620 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.82 7.24
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 132.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M620, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 156 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 193 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.