Quadro FX 1100 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	327	1458
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.49	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code name	GP104	NV36
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (8 years ago)	1 April 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$169.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	no data
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	425 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	82 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	97.20	1.700
Floating-point processing power	3.11 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	80	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	325 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	10.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	9.0a
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.5 (2.1)
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.88
+18656%

FX 1100 0.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6486
+18431%

FX 1100 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65	-0−1
4K	31	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−33	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	45−50	0−1
Metro Exodus	45−50	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45	0−1
Valorant	65−70	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−33	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	0−1
Dota 2	60−65	0−1
Far Cry 5	60−65	0−1
Fortnite	90−95	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	45−50	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65	0−1
Metro Exodus	45−50	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55	0−1
Valorant	65−70	0−1
World of Tanks	200−210 +20800%	1−2 −20800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−33	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	0−1
Dota 2	60−65	0−1
Far Cry 5	60−65	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	45−50	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120	0−1
Valorant	65−70	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16	0−1
World of Tanks	110−120	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Far Cry 5	40−45	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	40−45	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	24−27	0−1
Metro Exodus	35−40	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	0−1
Valorant	40−45	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Dota 2	27−30	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30	0−1
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	0−1
Dota 2	27−30	0−1
Far Cry 5	21−24	0−1
Fortnite	20−22	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	24−27	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	12−14	0−1
Valorant	18−20	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.88	0.09
Recency	11 January 2017	1 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	130 nm

P3000 Mobile has a 18655.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro FX 1100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.