Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.38no data
Power efficiency18.44no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP106G84
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)12 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102432
Core clock speed1076 MHz460 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate94.727.360
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.05888 TFLOPS
ROPs408
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length201 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount5 GB512 MB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
+3915%
FX 1700 181

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 42 Watt

Quadro P2000 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1700, on the other hand, has 78.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and Quadro FX 1700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 608 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.