GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P2000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.27
+14.9%

P2000 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking311347
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.4312.20
Power efficiency17.2214.98
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP106GP107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1050 Ti has 29% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed1076 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1392 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate94.7266.82
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS2.138 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mm145 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2000 16.27
+14.9%
GTX 1050 Ti 14.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
+14.9%
GTX 1050 Ti 6325

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P2000 8387
GTX 1050 Ti 9453
+12.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P2000 6847
GTX 1050 Ti 7485
+9.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 43566
GTX 1050 Ti 50939
+16.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P2000 22884
+10.3%
GTX 1050 Ti 20742

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 350317
GTX 1050 Ti 352876
+0.7%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P2000 23379
+17.8%
GTX 1050 Ti 19848

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P2000 21668
+5.1%
GTX 1050 Ti 20616

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+12%
50
−12%
1440p20
−50%
30
+50%
4K16
−62.5%
26
+62.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45
−276%
2.78
+276%
1440p29.25
−531%
4.63
+531%
4K36.56
−584%
5.35
+584%
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 276% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 531% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 584% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+16.1%
85−90
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+17.5%
63
−17.5%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+16.1%
85−90
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
Far Cry 5 47
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
Fortnite 144
+67.4%
85−90
−67.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+5.8%
69
−5.8%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+14.3%
45−50
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
−3.8%
55
+3.8%
Valorant 130−140
+8.8%
120−130
−8.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+42.3%
52
−42.3%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+16.1%
85−90
−16.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+8.4%
200−210
−8.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
Dota 2 102
−38.2%
141
+38.2%
Far Cry 5 41
−26.8%
50−55
+26.8%
Fortnite 60
−8.3%
65
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+14.1%
64
−14.1%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+14.3%
45−50
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+4.7%
64
−4.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+46.2%
26
−46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
−22%
50
+22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−28.9%
49
+28.9%
Valorant 130−140
+8.8%
120−130
−8.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+45.1%
51
−45.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
Dota 2 98
−27.6%
125
+27.6%
Far Cry 5 35
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+62.2%
45
−62.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
−24.1%
36
+24.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−4%
26
+4%
Valorant 130−140
+157%
53
−157%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+13.2%
110−120
−13.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+3.4%
29
−3.4%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+10.7%
140−150
−10.7%
Valorant 170−180
+9.6%
150−160
−9.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+38.9%
36
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 21
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+15.8%
35−40
−15.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+14.3%
28
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−69.2%
21−24
+69.2%
Valorant 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 60−65
−1.6%
63
+1.6%
Far Cry 5 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+55%
20
−55%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
−57.1%
11
+57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
−30%
13
+30%

This is how Quadro P2000 and GTX 1050 Ti compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 12% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 50% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 63% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 157% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 78% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is ahead in 47 tests (71%)
  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 18 tests (27%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.27 14.16
Recency 6 February 2017 25 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm

Quadro P2000 has a 14.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 691 vote

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 208318 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.