Quadro M1000M vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Quadro M1000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P2000 Max-Q
2017
4 GB GDDR5
13.68
+85.1%

P2000 Max-Q outperforms M1000M by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.03
Power efficiencyno data12.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP107GLGM107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date5 July 2017 (7 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Core clock speed1215 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data31.78
Floating-point processing powerno data1.017 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.68
+85.1%
M1000M 7.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5270
+85.1%
M1000M 2847

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P2000 Max-Q 8148
+92.6%
M1000M 4230

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Max-Q 6742
+92.8%
M1000M 3498

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Max-Q 28679
+22.4%
M1000M 23422

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
+20%
40
−20%
4K19
+46.2%
13
−46.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.02
4Kno data15.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+105%
21−24
−105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+65.1%
40−45
−65.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+90%
20−22
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+188%
24−27
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+105%
21−24
−105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+65.1%
40−45
−65.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+90%
20−22
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+80%
24−27
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+41.9%
62
−41.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+65.1%
40−45
−65.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+80%
24−27
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+127%
11
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+90%
20−22
−90%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%
Hitman 3 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+83%
45−50
−83%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+172%
24−27
−172%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+71.4%
7
−71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

This is how P2000 Max-Q and M1000M compete in popular games:

  • P2000 Max-Q is 20% faster in 1080p
  • P2000 Max-Q is 46% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the P2000 Max-Q is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P2000 Max-Q surpassed M1000M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.68 7.39
Recency 5 July 2017 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB/4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

P2000 Max-Q has a 85.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 551 vote

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.