Quadro GV100 vs Quadro P1000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 and Quadro GV100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.59

GV100 outperforms P1000 by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking41552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.792.65
Power efficiency19.8614.11
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP107GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $8,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 118% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6405120
Core clock speed1493 MHz1132 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz1627 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate48.61520.6
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPS16.66 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz848 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s868.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.17.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.59
Quadro GV100 51.45
+344%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4466
Quadro GV100 19824
+344%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P1000 14383
Quadro GV100 144084
+902%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P1000 14286
Quadro GV100 180942
+1167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−332%
190−200
+332%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.5247.36

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−332%
160−170
+332%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 108
−317%
450−500
+317%
Hitman 3 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−335%
270−280
+335%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−334%
230−240
+334%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−341%
300−310
+341%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−332%
160−170
+332%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 100
−300%
400−450
+300%
Hitman 3 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−335%
270−280
+335%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−332%
160−170
+332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−341%
300−310
+341%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−295%
300−310
+295%
Hitman 3 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−335%
270−280
+335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−332%
160−170
+332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−341%
300−310
+341%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−336%
240−250
+336%
Hitman 3 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−341%
75−80
+341%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−317%
300−310
+317%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Hitman 3 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−334%
230−240
+334%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%

This is how Quadro P1000 and Quadro GV100 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 332% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.59 51.45
Recency 7 February 2017 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P1000 has 525% lower power consumption.

Quadro GV100, on the other hand, has a 343.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 573 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 53 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.