UHD Graphics 620 vs Quadro M5500

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5500 with UHD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5500
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
20.55
+670%

M5500 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by a whopping 670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking268810
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Power efficiency9.3912.20
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048192
Core clock speed1140 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1165 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate149.124.00
Floating-point processing power4.772 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs12824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth211 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5500 20.55
+670%
UHD Graphics 620 2.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M5500 7915
+668%
UHD Graphics 620 1030

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+669%
13
−669%
1440p110−120
+633%
15
−633%
4K50−55
+614%
7
−614%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+450%
6
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+475%
8
−475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70
+738%
8
−738%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+600%
6
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+450%
10
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+232%
38
−232%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+145%
40
−145%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+511%
9
−511%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+353%
15
−353%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+210%
30
−210%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+686%
7−8
−686%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+250%
36
−250%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+188%
34
−188%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+518%
11
−518%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+229%
14
−229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+145%
35−40
−145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+869%
12−14
−869%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+1860%
5
−1860%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+386%
14
−386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+1433%
3
−1433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+145%
35−40
−145%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+721%
14−16
−721%
Hitman 3 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+650%
16−18
−650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Hitman 3 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+783%
12−14
−783%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

This is how Quadro M5500 and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5500 is 669% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5500 is 633% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M5500 is 614% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro M5500 is 3450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro M5500 surpassed UHD Graphics 620 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.55 2.67
Recency 8 April 2016 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro M5500 has a 669.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5500 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 620 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 36 votes

Rate Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4477 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.