GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M6-8Q GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-4A GRID M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
14.95
+3.2%

M4000 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.89no data
Power efficiency9.8922.98
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16641024
Core clock speed773 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate80.3976.80
Floating-point processing power2.573 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs10464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M4000 14.95
+3.2%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 14.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M4000 6679
+3.3%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6468

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
+1.9%
54
−1.9%
1440p30−35
−10%
33
+10%
4K24−27
+0%
24
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.38no data
1440p26.37no data
4K32.96no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro M4000 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M4000 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 10% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.95 14.48
Recency 29 June 2015 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M4000 has a 3.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M4000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
P106-100 P106 100
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
RTX 3050 OEM 3050 OEM
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
R7 250 250
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
R5 230 230
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
HD 8470 OEM 8470 OEM
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
ATI HD 4870 4870
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
GeForce 930MX 930MX
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q 3000 Max-Q
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 1650 GDDR6
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Arc A530M A530M
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile 3050 A Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 250 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 217 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.