Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro M3000M

Place in the ranking	354	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.38	53.94
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM204	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,024	2048
Core clock speed	1050 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.20	129.6
Floating-point processing power	2.15 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M3000M 14.49

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+88.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M3000M 8289

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+144%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

M3000M 27405

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+142%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M3000M 6537

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+116%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60 −83.3%	110−120 +83.3%
4K	28 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−81.8%

40−45
+81.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −84.8%	85−90 +84.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −79.5%	70−75 +79.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −82.8%	170−180 +82.8%
Hitman 3	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −78.1%	130−140 +78.1%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −79.5%	70−75 +79.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −80.9%	85−90 +80.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −84.2%	140−150 +84.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −84.8%	85−90 +84.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −79.5%	70−75 +79.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −82.8%	170−180 +82.8%
Hitman 3	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −78.1%	130−140 +78.1%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −79.5%	70−75 +79.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −80.9%	85−90 +80.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90 −77.8%	160−170 +77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −84.2%	140−150 +84.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −82.8%	170−180 +82.8%
Hitman 3	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −78.1%	130−140 +78.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −80.9%	85−90 +80.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −84.2%	140−150 +84.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−79.5%

70−75
+79.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −75.7%	130−140 +75.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −81.8%	160−170 +81.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−73.9%

40−45
+73.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Hitman 3	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −83.1%	130−140 +83.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−84.6%

24−27
+84.6%

This is how M3000M and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 83% faster in 1080p
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 79% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.49	27.26
Recency	18 August 2015	26 February 2024
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 88.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M3000M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.