Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Quadro K1100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1100M and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

K1100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.83

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms K1100M by a whopping 828% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking796210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Power efficiency4.3122.49
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed706 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate22.59198.7
Floating-point processing power0.5422 TFLOPS6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1100M 2.83
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.26
+828%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1100M 1090
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+828%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1100M 1827
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+988%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1100M 8992
RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+459%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K1100M 1341
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+1007%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K1100M 9228
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+890%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

K1100M 14
RTX 3000 Mobile 74
+431%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

K1100M 33
RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+231%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

K1100M 15
RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+647%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

K1100M 16
RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+609%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

K1100M 16
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+654%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

K1100M 6
RTX 3000 Mobile 46
+736%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

K1100M 9
RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+801%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

K1100M 0
RTX 3000 Mobile 12
+2850%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

K1100M 9
RTX 3000 Mobile 82
+801%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

K1100M 14
RTX 3000 Mobile 74
+431%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

K1100M 16
RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+609%

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

K1100M 33
RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+231%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

K1100M 15
RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+647%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

K1100M 16
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+654%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

K1100M 6
RTX 3000 Mobile 46
+736%

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

K1100M 0.4
RTX 3000 Mobile 11.8
+2850%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−512%
104
+512%
4K9−10
−878%
88
+878%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.47no data
4K12.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−756%
77
+756%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−2050%
85−90
+2050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−657%
50−55
+657%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−750%
65−70
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−907%
150−160
+907%
Hitman 3 8−9
−563%
50−55
+563%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−179%
100−110
+179%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−533%
55−60
+533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−2050%
85−90
+2050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−657%
50−55
+657%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−750%
65−70
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−907%
150−160
+907%
Hitman 3 8−9
−563%
50−55
+563%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−143%
55−60
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−179%
100−110
+179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
39
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−657%
50−55
+657%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−907%
150−160
+907%
Hitman 3 8−9
−563%
50−55
+563%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−1300%
56
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−179%
100−110
+179%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−288%
30−35
+288%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−671%
50−55
+671%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−759%
140−150
+759%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−633%
40−45
+633%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 35−40
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how K1100M and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 512% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 878% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 26.26
Recency 23 July 2013 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

K1100M has 77.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 827.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 223 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 288 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.