T1000 vs Quadro FX 1600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1600M with T1000, including specs and performance data.

FX 1600M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 50 Watt
0.34

T1000 outperforms FX 1600M by a whopping 5744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1295277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.4727.23
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG84TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2007 (17 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.90 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32896
Core clock speed625 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors289 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0078.12
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1600M 0.34
T1000 19.87
+5744%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1600M 131
T1000 7655
+5744%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−157

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−5525%
450−500
+5525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−5614%
1600−1650
+5614%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−5525%
450−500
+5525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−5456%
500−550
+5456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−5614%
1600−1650
+5614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−5525%
450−500
+5525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−5456%
500−550
+5456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−5614%
1600−1650
+5614%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 19.87
Recency 1 June 2007 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm

T1000 has a 5744.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1600M is a mobile workstation card while T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.