GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with GeForce RTX 2080 Super, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.34

RTX 2080 Super outperforms 5000M by a whopping 851% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.94
Power efficiency3.6613.92
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)23 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203072
Core clock speed405 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate16.20348.5
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs40192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.34
RTX 2080 Super 50.76
+851%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
RTX 2080 Super 19558
+850%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−900%
140
+900%
1440p10−12
−870%
97
+870%
4K7−8
−871%
68
+871%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data7.21
4Kno data10.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−607%
99
+607%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1467%
94
+1467%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1286%
194
+1286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1055%
127
+1055%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1075%
141
+1075%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−1033%
170
+1033%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−682%
266
+682%
Hitman 3 10−12
−927%
113
+927%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−785%
301
+785%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1008%
144
+1008%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−771%
122
+771%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−942%
198
+942%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−383%
227
+383%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−914%
142
+914%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1217%
79
+1217%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1200%
182
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−991%
120
+991%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−833%
112
+833%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−753%
128
+753%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−659%
258
+659%
Hitman 3 10−12
−955%
116
+955%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−732%
283
+732%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1008%
144
+1008%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−614%
100
+614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1084%
225
+1084%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−483%
100−110
+483%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−349%
211
+349%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−386%
68
+386%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1067%
70
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−718%
90
+718%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−889%
89
+889%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−558%
79
+558%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−291%
133
+291%
Hitman 3 10−12
−882%
108
+882%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−376%
162
+376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−895%
189
+895%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−506%
109
+506%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−59.6%
75
+59.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−743%
118
+743%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1240%
134
+1240%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1063%
93
+1063%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 57
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1200%
65
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1815%
249
+1815%
Hitman 3 9−10
−778%
79
+778%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−958%
127
+958%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2900%
90
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−521%
211
+521%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−970%
107
+970%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Hitman 3 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1356%
131
+1356%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4350%
89
+4350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1267%
41
+1267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1700%
36
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1850%
39
+1850%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 31
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1520%
81
+1520%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−900%
60
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141
+0%
141
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82
+0%
82
+0%

This is how Quadro 5000M and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 900% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 870% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 871% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.34 50.76
Recency 27 July 2010 23 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro 5000M has 150% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 850.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2520 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.