GeForce GT 730 vs ATI Mobility Radeon
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon with GeForce GT 730, including specs and performance data.
GT 730 outperforms ATI Mobility by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1024 | 858 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 34 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.19 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.07 |
| Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | M6 | GF108 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 December 2001 (22 years ago) | 18 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $59.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 144 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 30 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 49 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.43 | 11.2 GT/s |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.2688 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 1 | 4 |
| TMUs | 3 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 144 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.304 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 2.16 |
| Recency | 1 December 2001 | 18 June 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 40 nm |
GT 730 has a 62.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GT 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon is a notebook card while GeForce GT 730 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
