GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon and GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility
2001
16 MB DDR
1.33

GT 650M Mac Edition outperforms ATI Mobility by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1018957
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.46
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM6GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 December 2001 (22 years ago)12 July 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed144 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors30 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate0.4328.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs332

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed144 MHz1254 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.304 GB/s80.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 1.59
Recency 1 December 2001 12 July 2012
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm

GT 650M Mac Edition has a 19.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon
Mobility Radeon
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 18 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.