GeForce G102M vs ATI Mobility Radeon
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon and GeForce G102M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ATI Mobility outperforms G102M by a whopping 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1025 | 1247 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.11 |
| Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | M6 | C79 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 December 2001 (23 years ago) | 8 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 144 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 30 million | 314 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 14 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.43 | 3.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.0352 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | no data | 48 |
| ROPs | 1 | 4 |
| TMUs | 3 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 1.0 |
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | Up to 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 144 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.304 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | no data | 8.0 |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.34 | 0.43 |
| Recency | 1 December 2001 | 8 January 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 65 nm |
ATI Mobility has a 211.6% higher aggregate performance score.
GeForce G102M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Mobility Radeon is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
