Radeon R5 A240 vs ATI Mobility HD 540v
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 540v with Radeon R5 A240, including specs and performance data.
R5 A240 outperforms Mobility HD 540v by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1359 | 1049 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.75 | 2.13 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | M92 | Oland |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 2014 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 780 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 242 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.400 | 15.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.088 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1800 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 (5.1) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.170 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−286%
|
27−30
+286%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−285%
|
100−105
+285%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−293%
|
55−60
+293%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−286%
|
27−30
+286%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−285%
|
100−105
+285%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−286%
|
27−30
+286%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−285%
|
100−105
+285%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−293%
|
55−60
+293%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 1.38 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 540v has 233% lower power consumption.
R5 A240, on the other hand, has a 306% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R5 A240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 540v in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 540v is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
