Radeon R5 A240 vs ATI E4690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E4690 and Radeon R5 A240, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI E4690
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.97

R5 A240 outperforms E4690 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11661049
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.492.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV730Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2009 (16 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320320
Core clock speed600 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors514 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2015.60
ROPs88
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (11_1)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan-1.2.170

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI E4690 0.97
R5 A240 1.38
+42.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI E4690 405
Samples: 3
R5 A240 576
+42.2%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 1.38
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

ATI E4690 has 67% lower power consumption.

R5 A240, on the other hand, has a 42% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R5 A240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E4690 or Radeon R5 A240, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.