ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 with Radeon 9800 PRO, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.30
+131%

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 outperforms ATI 9800 PRO by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13091436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.22
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameM86R350
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed600 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors378 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data47 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8003.040
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Valorant 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Valorant 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Valorant 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Valorant 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.13
Recency 7 January 2008 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 has a 130.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Mobility FireGL V5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5700 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or Radeon 9800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.