Radeon 760M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.94

760M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425354
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data68.10
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XePhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data83.17
Floating-point processing powerno data5.323 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.94
Radeon 760M 14.90
+36.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710
Radeon 760M 9603
+43.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820
Radeon 760M 6142
+27.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040
Radeon 760M 41767
+9.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−52.4%
32
+52.4%
1440p12−14
−58.3%
19
+58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−40.9%
30−35
+40.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−39.4%
95−100
+39.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−32.8%
75−80
+32.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−40.9%
30−35
+40.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−39.4%
95−100
+39.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−32.8%
75−80
+32.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−25.7%
44
+25.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−39.4%
95−100
+39.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+21.7%
23
−21.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−58.3%
75−80
+58.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
+0%
37
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 52% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 760M is 58% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 22% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 760M is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 32 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.94 14.90
Recency 15 August 2020 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Radeon 760M has a 36.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2549 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 191 vote

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.