GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Place in the ranking	467	2
Place by popularity	87	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	17.27
Power efficiency	23.19	14.79
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	14592
Core clock speed	400 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	1,149
Floating-point processing power	no data	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	176
TMUs	no data	456
Tensor Cores	no data	456
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	no data	24 GB
Memory bus width	no data	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	26 −862%	250−260 +862%
1440p	15 −833%	140−150 +833%
4K	11 −809%	100−110 +809%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	6.40
1440p	no data	11.42
4K	no data	15.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

20
−850%

190−200

+850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22 −855%	210−220 +855%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 −852%	200−210 +852%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −866%	280−290 +866%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36 −733%	300−310 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 −838%	150−160 +838%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −855%	210−220 +855%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −862%	250−260 +862%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −852%	600−650 +852%
Hitman 3	24 −858%	230−240 +858%
Horizon Zero Dawn	124 −868%	1200−1250 +868%
Metro Exodus	35 −757%	300−310 +757%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 −841%	160−170 +841%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −868%	300−310 +868%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90 −844%	850−900 +844%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −857%	220−230 +857%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 −844%	170−180 +844%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −866%	280−290 +866%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 −838%	300−310 +838%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 −823%	120−130 +823%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −855%	210−220 +855%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −862%	250−260 +862%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −852%	600−650 +852%
Hitman 3	23 −857%	220−230 +857%
Horizon Zero Dawn	112 −838%	1050−1100 +838%
Metro Exodus	28 −864%	270−280 +864%
Red Dead Redemption 2	26 −862%	250−260 +862%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 −867%	290−300 +867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −862%	250−260 +862%
Watch Dogs: Legion	84 −852%	800−850 +852%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 −829%	130−140 +829%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	23 −857%	220−230 +857%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −809%	100−105 +809%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −855%	210−220 +855%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −852%	600−650 +852%
Hitman 3	20 −850%	190−200 +850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	23 −857%	220−230 +857%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24 −858%	230−240 +858%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −829%	130−140 +829%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −802%	550−600 +802%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14
−829%

130−140

+829%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −844%	170−180 +844%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −829%	65−70 +829%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −754%	350−400 +754%
Hitman 3	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −850%	190−200 +850%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 −847%	180−190 +847%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −817%	550−600 +817%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
−838%

150−160

+838%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
Hitman 3	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −797%	350−400 +797%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 −817%	110−120 +817%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11 −809%	100−105 +809%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−844%

85−90

+844%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 862% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 D is 833% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 D is 809% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.47	91.70
Recency	15 August 2020	28 December 2023
Chip lithography	10 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	425 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 1417.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 868.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.