Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
2020
28 Watt
7.57

RX 6800 XT outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 757% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52528
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.49
Power efficiency18.8415.07
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804608
Core clock speed400 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data648.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.74 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57
RX 6800 XT 64.88
+757%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332
RX 6800 XT 52046
+876%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
RX 6800 XT 96516
+344%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010
RX 6800 XT 49735
+1140%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931
RX 6800 XT 193053
+780%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479
RX 6800 XT 504438
+203%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−974%
204
+974%
1440p10
−1340%
144
+1340%
4K14
−564%
93
+564%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.18
1440pno data4.51
4Kno data6.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
−793%
120−130
+793%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−605%
130−140
+605%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−732%
158
+732%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−836%
200−210
+836%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−673%
110−120
+673%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−862%
120−130
+862%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−576%
110−120
+576%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−648%
150−160
+648%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−376%
230−240
+376%
Hitman 3 16
−725%
132
+725%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−458%
240−250
+458%
Metro Exodus 38
−279%
144
+279%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−510%
122
+510%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−972%
260−270
+972%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−398%
309
+398%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−605%
130−140
+605%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−744%
135
+744%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−836%
200−210
+836%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−673%
110−120
+673%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−1150%
120−130
+1150%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−576%
110−120
+576%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−648%
150−160
+648%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−376%
230−240
+376%
Hitman 3 15
−807%
136
+807%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−458%
240−250
+458%
Metro Exodus 27
−433%
144
+433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−495%
110−120
+495%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
−1379%
355
+1379%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−523%
130−140
+523%
Watch Dogs: Legion 49
−531%
309
+531%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−605%
130−140
+605%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−1080%
118
+1080%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−673%
110−120
+673%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−1463%
120−130
+1463%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−576%
110−120
+576%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−376%
230−240
+376%
Hitman 3 12
−917%
122
+917%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−1644%
279
+1644%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−1410%
302
+1410%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−1355%
160
+1355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−104%
112
+104%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−500%
120
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−964%
140−150
+964%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−827%
100−110
+827%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−3167%
98
+3167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−986%
75−80
+986%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2100%
65−70
+2100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−744%
75−80
+744%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−904%
270−280
+904%
Hitman 3 10−12
−936%
114
+936%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1244%
215
+1244%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1300%
112
+1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−1288%
222
+1288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−1040%
110−120
+1040%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−568%
314
+568%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−792%
116
+792%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−796%
220−230
+796%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2420%
126
+2420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2650%
110
+2650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2067%
65
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1225%
100−110
+1225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−6550%
133
+6550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−986%
76
+986%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 974% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 1340% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 564% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 6550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6800 XT surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.57 64.88
Recency 15 August 2020 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 300 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 971.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 757.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 902 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3464 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.