HD Graphics P4000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and HD Graphics P4000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014
15 Watt
4.13
+208%

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 outperforms HD Graphics P4000 by a whopping 208% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6901024
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.872.04
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eIvy Bridge GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed300 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4020.00
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs61
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.44.0
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.801.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.13
+208%
HD Graphics P4000 1.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1592
+209%
HD Graphics P4000 516

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.13 1.34
Recency 5 September 2014 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has a 208.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P4000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Intel HD Graphics P4000
HD Graphics P4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 101 vote

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.