Radeon Pro 5300M vs Iris Plus Graphics 940

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.60
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed400 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00100.0
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2480
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 940 has 467% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300M, on the other hand, has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 940 and Radeon Pro 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 940 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 83 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 193 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 940 or Radeon Pro 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.