GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking337not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameN18P-G0 / N18P-G61GM204
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)9 January 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1020 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1245 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate72.0073.60
Floating-point performance2.304 gflops2.355 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.55.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 9 January 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 589 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.