Tesla T4 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 650 with Tesla T4, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.56

Tesla T4 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 by a whopping 511% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.8427.30
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed300 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors189 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20254.4
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.56
Tesla T4 27.88
+511%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757
Tesla T4 10744
+511%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−479%
110−120
+479%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Hitman 3 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−500%
270−280
+500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Hitman 3 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−500%
270−280
+500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Hitman 3 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−500%
270−280
+500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Hitman 3 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Hitman 3 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Tesla T4 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T4 is 479% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 27.88
Recency 3 January 2017 13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 650 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla T4, on the other hand, has a 511.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a notebook card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 98 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 228 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.