GeForce 920M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce 920M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.56
+145%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 outperforms 920M by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.843.86
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGK208B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed300 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate55.2030.53
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs68
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.56
+145%
GeForce 920M 1.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757
+145%
GeForce 920M 718

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 2762
+60.7%
GeForce 920M 1719

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1698
+46.2%
GeForce 920M 1162

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 13153
+81.6%
GeForce 920M 7242

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 161538
+78.3%
GeForce 920M 90619

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Iris Plus Graphics 650 555
+68.7%
GeForce 920M 329

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+26.7%
15
−26.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−15.4%
15
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
17
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4
−325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce 920M compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is 27% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 is 1000% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 920M is 15% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is ahead in 51 test (96%)
  • GeForce 920M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 1.86
Recency 3 January 2017 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 650 has a 145.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 98 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1320 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.