Arc A380 vs HD Graphics 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5000 with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 5000
2013
30 Watt
1.52

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 5000 by a whopping 962% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking974334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.12
Power efficiency3.4714.75
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201024
Core clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate40.00131.2
Floating-point processing power0.64 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4064
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 5000 1.52
Arc A380 16.14
+962%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5000 586
Arc A380 6219
+961%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 5000 1034
Arc A380 13892
+1244%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 5000 4277
Arc A380 53979
+1162%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 5000 716
Arc A380 10174
+1322%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 5000 5694
Arc A380 60804
+968%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 5000 65904
Arc A380 466666
+608%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

HD Graphics 5000 12
Arc A380 53979
+446007%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−370%
47
+370%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−917%
61
+917%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5367%
160−170
+5367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−780%
130−140
+780%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1188%
100−110
+1188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−242%
110−120
+242%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1100%
72
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5367%
160−170
+5367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−780%
130−140
+780%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−900%
80
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−242%
110−120
+242%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−383%
29
+383%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−247%
52
+247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−663%
61
+663%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−209%
34
+209%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+32%
25
−32%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Hitman 3 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1140%
60−65
+1140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 18−20
Far Cry 5 0−1 16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+0%
37
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+0%
31
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 5000 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 370% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 5000 is 32% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5000 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 43 tests (68%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 16.14
Recency 27 May 2013 14 June 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt

HD Graphics 5000 has 150% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 961.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5000 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5000
HD Graphics 5000
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 182 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 836 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.