ATI Radeon 8500 vs HD Graphics 500

Place in the ranking	1151	1492
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.95	0.06
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	Apollo Lake GT1	R200
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	200 MHz	275 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	60 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	2.200
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	2	4
TMUs	12	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	AGP 4x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	275 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	8.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 500 0.77
+3750%

ATI 8500 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 500 298
+4867%

ATI 8500 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9	-0−1
1440p	1	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	7−8	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.77	0.02
Recency	1 September 2015	14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	23 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has a 3750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 130% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook card while Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.