ION 2 vs HD Graphics 500

Place in the ranking	1155	1308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.95	1.14
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Apollo Lake GT1	GT218
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	16
Core clock speed	200 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	260 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	4.000
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	0.03424 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	4
TMUs	12	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	-	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9 +200%	3−4 −200%
1440p	1	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4 −50%	6−7 +50%
Fortnite	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3 −133%	7−8 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
World of Tanks	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	5 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
World of Tanks	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD Graphics 500 and ION 2 compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 500 is 200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 500 is 100% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ION 2 is 133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD Graphics 500 is ahead in 19 tests (59%)
ION 2 is ahead in 2 tests (6%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.78	0.33
Recency	1 September 2015	3 June 2008
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	20 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has a 136.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.