HD Graphics 16EU Mobile vs HD Graphics 32EU Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameBay Trail GT1Ironlake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
Core clock speed311 MHz133 MHz
Boost clock speed646 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.5848.000
Floating-point processing power0.04134 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs12
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusQPI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)10.1
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.02.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2013 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 32EU Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 32EU Mobile and HD Graphics 16EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 32EU Mobile
HD Graphics 32EU Mobile
Intel HD Graphics 16EU Mobile
HD Graphics 16EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 6 votes

Rate HD Graphics 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate HD Graphics 16EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.