GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.69

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 11233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11759
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.39
Power efficiencyno data24.37
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores487168
Core clock speed650 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors392 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown220 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900554.4
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs180
TMUs6224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2500 0.69
RTX 4070 SUPER 78.20
+11233%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 2500 351
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+19407%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 2500 318
RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+15270%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 2500 2605
RTX 4070 SUPER 171098
+6469%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−3057%
221
+3057%
1440p1−2
−13800%
139
+13800%
4K0−186

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.71
1440pno data4.31
4Kno data6.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−19300%
190−200
+19300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2427%
270−280
+2427%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5517%
300−350
+5517%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−413%
150−160
+413%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−19300%
190−200
+19300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2427%
270−280
+2427%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−7033%
428
+7033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1610%
170−180
+1610%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−413%
150−160
+413%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2427%
270−280
+2427%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6250%
381
+6250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1910%
201
+1910%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−363%
139
+363%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1800%
110−120
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−6767%
200−210
+6767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−11900%
240−250
+11900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4000%
120−130
+4000%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6600%
65−70
+6600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
+0%
265
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+0%
133
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 132
+0%
132
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
+0%
62
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 3057% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 13800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 19300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 30 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 78.20
Recency 1 April 2012 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 11233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1414 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3957 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.