RTX A1000 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.75

RTX A1000 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking450180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42304
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−200%
75−80
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−208%
200−210
+208%
Hitman 3 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−196%
160−170
+196%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−206%
190−200
+206%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−208%
200−210
+208%
Hitman 3 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−196%
160−170
+196%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−208%
120−130
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−206%
190−200
+206%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−208%
200−210
+208%
Hitman 3 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−196%
160−170
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−200%
90−95
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−206%
190−200
+206%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Hitman 3 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−206%
190−200
+206%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 is 200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.75 30.55
Recency 14 December 2023 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has a 213.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while RTX A1000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.