RTX A1000 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
10.38

RTX A1000 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.80
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42304
Core clock speedno data727 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.3
Floating-point processing powerno data6.737 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data72
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−160%
65−70
+160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−169%
35−40
+169%
Elden Ring 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−165%
90−95
+165%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−145%
27−30
+145%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−160%
130−140
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−163%
210−220
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Valorant 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−165%
90−95
+165%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−169%
35−40
+169%
Dota 2 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Elden Ring 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Far Cry 5 24
−171%
65−70
+171%
Fortnite 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Forza Horizon 4 39
−156%
100−105
+156%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−163%
210−220
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Valorant 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
World of Tanks 140−150
−168%
400−450
+168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−165%
90−95
+165%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Fortnite 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−167%
80−85
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−163%
210−220
+163%
Valorant 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Elden Ring 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
World of Tanks 75−80
−167%
200−210
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Valorant 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Dota 2 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Elden Ring 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Fortnite 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Valorant 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 is 160% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.38 28.18
Recency 14 December 2023 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has a 171.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.