RTX A1000 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Place in the ranking	450	210
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	38.71
Architecture	Xe LPG (2023)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Meteor Lake iGPU	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	14 December 2023 (1 year ago)	16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4	2304
Core clock speed	no data	727 MHz
Boost clock speed	1950 MHz	1462 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	105.3
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	72
Tensor Cores	no data	72
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	163 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−160%

65−70
+160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

−169%

35−40
+169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Counter-Strike 2	11 −173%	30−33 +173%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −166%	85−90 +166%
Forza Horizon 4	50 −160%	130−140 +160%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −165%	90−95 +165%
Valorant	90−95 −172%	250−260 +172%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	16 −150%	40−45 +150%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Counter-Strike 2	13 −169%	35−40 +169%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Far Cry 5	24 −171%	65−70 +171%
Fortnite	55−60 −163%	150−160 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	39 −156%	100−105 +156%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
Grand Theft Auto V	15 −167%	40−45 +167%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −165%	90−95 +165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
Valorant	90−95 −172%	250−260 +172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −166%	85−90 +166%
Fortnite	55−60 −163%	150−160 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	30 −167%	80−85 +167%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −165%	90−95 +165%
Valorant	90−95 −172%	250−260 +172%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	70−75 −174%	200−210 +174%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −165%	130−140 +165%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Valorant	100−110 −171%	290−300 +171%

1440p
Epic Preset

Atomic Heart

12−14

−169%

35−40
+169%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%

4K
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Fortnite	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Valorant	50−55 −160%	130−140 +160%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:

RTX A1000 is 160% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.26	28.23
Recency	14 December 2023	16 April 2024
Chip lithography	5 nm	8 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has a 175.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)

Iris Xe Graphics G7

RTX A1000

Radeon Pro SSG

Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)

Radeon RX Vega M GL

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce FX 5200

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Quadro P3000 Mobile

Radeon Graphics 128SP

Quadro T2000 Mobile

Radeon RX 590 GME

GeForce GT 1030

H100 PCIe

Quadro P4000 Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

M3 Max 40-Core GPU

GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.2 29 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.