Radeon PRO W6300 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated359
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.08
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAD102Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2023 (1 year ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18176768
Core clock speed2325 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed2565 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate1,45797.92
Floating-point processing power93.24 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs19232
TMUs56848
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores14212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.15 TB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 4090 Ti has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

PRO W6300, on the other hand, has 2300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and Radeon PRO W6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 3136 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.