Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4080 SUPER
2024
16 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
88.71
+225%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5198
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.13no data
Power efficiency19.2053.94
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD103AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102402048
Core clock speed2295 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2550 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate816.0129.6
Floating-point processing power52.22 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs32064
Tensor Cores32064
Ray Tracing Cores8016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length310 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1438 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth736.3 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 SUPER 88.71
+225%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4080 SUPER 87055
+330%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4080 SUPER 141652
+114%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4080 SUPER 59075
+318%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD263
+229%
80−85
−229%
1440p186
+238%
55−60
−238%
4K118
+237%
35−40
−237%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.80no data
1440p5.37no data
4K8.47no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 235
+236%
70−75
−236%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 281
+231%
85−90
−231%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+249%
70−75
−249%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+243%
35−40
−243%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+235%
60−65
−235%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+230%
80−85
−230%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+228%
95−100
−228%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+244%
45−50
−244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+254%
35−40
−254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+231%
120−130
−231%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+242%
45−50
−242%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 342
+242%
100−105
−242%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 237
+239%
70−75
−239%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+249%
70−75
−249%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+243%
35−40
−243%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+235%
60−65
−235%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+230%
80−85
−230%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+228%
95−100
−228%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+244%
45−50
−244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+254%
35−40
−254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 568
+234%
170−180
−234%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210
+238%
60−65
−238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+242%
45−50
−242%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 158
+251%
45−50
−251%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 209
+248%
60−65
−248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+243%
35−40
−243%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%
Forza Horizon 4 322
+239%
95−100
−239%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 425
+227%
130−140
−227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 527
+229%
160−170
−229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 263
+229%
80−85
−229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 145
+263%
40−45
−263%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+254%
35−40
−254%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+232%
50−55
−232%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+273%
30−33
−273%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
+238%
40−45
−238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 165
+230%
50−55
−230%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+250%
24−27
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+239%
80−85
−239%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 345
+245%
100−105
−245%
Metro Exodus 171
+242%
50−55
−242%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 397
+231%
120−130
−231%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221
+240%
65−70
−240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+243%
70−75
−243%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+226%
27−30
−226%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+229%
21−24
−229%
Hitman 3 80−85
+246%
24−27
−246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85
+254%
24−27
−254%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+255%
40−45
−255%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+240%
60−65
−240%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 96
+256%
27−30
−256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99
+230%
30−33
−230%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Forza Horizon 4 305
+239%
90−95
−239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 201
+235%
60−65
−235%
Watch Dogs: Legion 81
+238%
24−27
−238%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+270%
30−33
−270%

This is how RTX 4080 SUPER and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 229% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 238% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 237% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 88.71 27.26
Recency 8 January 2024 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 4080 SUPER has a 225.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 814.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1695 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.