Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
59.39
+460%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34435
Place by popularity9018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.08no data
Power efficiency24.78no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameAD106Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores435296
Core clock speed2310 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2535 MHzno data
Number of transistors22,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Wattno data
Texture fill rate344.8no data
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.39
+460%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.61

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 43112
+543%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 32275
+570%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 165263
+334%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD173
+477%
30−35
−477%
1440p94
+488%
16−18
−488%
4K57
+470%
10−12
−470%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.88no data
1440p5.31no data
4K8.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+475%
24−27
−475%
Elden Ring 167
+519%
27−30
−519%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+234%
35−40
−234%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+475%
24−27
−475%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+719%
40−45
−719%
Metro Exodus 160
+493%
27−30
−493%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+286%
27−30
−286%
Valorant 260−270
+565%
40−45
−565%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+234%
35−40
−234%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+475%
24−27
−475%
Dota 2 163
+329%
35−40
−329%
Elden Ring 220−230
+537%
35−40
−537%
Far Cry 5 139
+223%
40−45
−223%
Fortnite 230−240
+276%
60−65
−276%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+548%
40−45
−548%
Grand Theft Auto V 163
+329%
35−40
−329%
Metro Exodus 127
+338%
27−30
−338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+165%
80−85
−165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+286%
27−30
−286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+444%
30−35
−444%
Valorant 260−270
+565%
40−45
−565%
World of Tanks 270−280
+84.8%
150−160
−84.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+234%
35−40
−234%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+475%
24−27
−475%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+174%
40−45
−174%
Forza Horizon 4 235
+460%
40−45
−460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+165%
80−85
−165%
Valorant 260−270
+491%
45−50
−491%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 101
+461%
18−20
−461%
Elden Ring 140−150
+500%
24−27
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+621%
14−16
−621%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+483%
30−33
−483%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
World of Tanks 350−400
+502%
65−70
−502%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+314%
21−24
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+508%
12−14
−508%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+596%
21−24
−596%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+538%
24−27
−538%
Metro Exodus 119
+467%
21−24
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+500%
16−18
−500%
Valorant 230−240
+480%
40−45
−480%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+475%
12−14
−475%
Dota 2 101
+461%
18−20
−461%
Elden Ring 70−75
+517%
12−14
−517%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+381%
21−24
−381%
Metro Exodus 48
+700%
6−7
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+497%
35−40
−497%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+381%
21−24
−381%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+733%
9−10
−733%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+475%
12−14
−475%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+708%
12−14
−708%
Fortnite 95−100
+500%
16−18
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+515%
12−14
−515%
Valorant 130−140
+519%
21−24
−519%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 477% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 488% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 470% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 733% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is ahead in 32 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.39 10.61
Recency 18 May 2023 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 459.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 982 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2626 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.