Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce RTX 3090

Place in the ranking	24	150
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.74	no data
Power efficiency	13.66	19.83
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA102	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10496	2048
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	2469 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.0	316.0
Floating-point processing power	35.58 TFLOPS	20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	64
TMUs	328	128
Tensor Cores	328	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	82	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	336 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1219 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	936.2 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 69.47
+101%

RX 7600M XT 34.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 26706
+101%

RX 7600M XT 13286

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3090 61518
+61.7%

RX 7600M XT 38039

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3090 124350
+31.3%

RX 7600M XT 94691

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3090 47241
+64.7%

RX 7600M XT 28686

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3090 231612
+48.6%

RX 7600M XT 155836

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3090 779348
+71.7%

RX 7600M XT 453957

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 3090 300
+48.9%

RX 7600M XT 202

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 3090 105

RX 7600M XT 218
+109%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 3090 16

RX 7600M XT 186
+1034%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 3090 170

RX 7600M XT 230
+35.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 3090 93
+7.2%

RX 7600M XT 87

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 3090 86

RX 7600M XT 112
+29.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 3090 262
+121%

RX 7600M XT 119

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX 3090 26
+3.2%

RX 7600M XT 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

RTX 3090 368
+79.1%

RX 7600M XT 206

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	197 +69.8%	116 −69.8%
1440p	128 +133%	55 −133%
4K	87 +164%	33 −164%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	7.61	no data
1440p	11.71	no data
4K	17.23	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	220 +110%	105 −110%
Cyberpunk 2077	207 +184%	70−75 −184%
Elden Ring	238 +76.3%	135 −76.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	102 +5.2%	95−100 −5.2%
Counter-Strike 2	188 +109%	90 −109%
Cyberpunk 2077	151 +107%	70−75 −107%
Forza Horizon 4	505 +98%	255 −98%
Metro Exodus	169 +55%	109 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130 +85.7%	70−75 −85.7%
Valorant	393 +185%	130−140 −185%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +20.6%	95−100 −20.6%
Counter-Strike 2	161 +96.3%	82 −96.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	135 +84.9%	70−75 −84.9%
Dota 2	186 +109%	89 −109%
Elden Ring	297 +150%	110−120 −150%
Far Cry 5	147 +110%	70 −110%
Fortnite	270−280 +73.9%	150−160 −73.9%
Forza Horizon 4	402 +93.3%	208 −93.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	171 +29.5%	132 −29.5%
Metro Exodus	150 +66.7%	90 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +13.2%	190−200 −13.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	132 +88.6%	70−75 −88.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +46.2%	110−120 −46.2%
Valorant	222 +60.9%	130−140 −60.9%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0.4%	270−280 −0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95 −2.1%	95−100 +2.1%
Counter-Strike 2	146 +143%	60 −143%
Cyberpunk 2077	121 +65.8%	70−75 −65.8%
Dota 2	213 +90.2%	110−120 −90.2%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +44%	90−95 −44%
Forza Horizon 4	351 +95%	180 −95%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +13.2%	190−200 −13.2%
Valorant	296 +114%	130−140 −114%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	150 +114%	70 −114%
Elden Ring	189 +182%	65−70 −182%
Grand Theft Auto V	150 +117%	69 −117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	92 +179%	30−35 −179%
World of Tanks	450−500 +120%	220−230 −120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	91 +37.9%	65−70 −37.9%
Counter-Strike 2	96 +191%	30−35 −191%
Cyberpunk 2077	87 +164%	30−35 −164%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +45.5%	110−120 −45.5%
Forza Horizon 4	266 +122%	120 −122%
Metro Exodus	139 +51.1%	92 −51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	152 +105%	74 −105%
Valorant	295 +186%	100−110 −186%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	59 +5800%	1 −5800%
Dota 2	182 +146%	74 −146%
Elden Ring	105 +239%	30−35 −239%
Grand Theft Auto V	182 +146%	74 −146%
Metro Exodus	76 +117%	35 −117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +90%	110−120 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	64 +191%	21−24 −191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	182 +146%	74 −146%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	91 +133%	35−40 −133%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +562%	13 −562%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +221%	14−16 −221%
Dota 2	202 +211%	65−70 −211%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +114%	45−50 −114%
Fortnite	95−100 +104%	45−50 −104%
Forza Horizon 4	159 +148%	64 −148%
Valorant	188 +255%	50−55 −255%

This is how RTX 3090 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 is 70% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 is 133% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 is 164% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3090 is 5800% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 2% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3090 is ahead in 61 test (97%)
RX 7600M XT is ahead in 1 test (2%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	69.47	34.56
Recency	1 September 2020	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	120 Watt