Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GeForce RTX 3080

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 and Radeon RX 7700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3080
2020
10 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
65.41
+12.4%

RTX 3080 outperforms RX 7700 XT by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2639
Place by popularity93not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.2571.01
Power efficiency14.2516.56
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 54% better value for money than RTX 3080.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores87043456
Core clock speed1440 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz2544 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate465.1549.5
Floating-point processing power29.77 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs272216
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores6854

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length285 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB12 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 65.41
+12.4%
RX 7700 XT 58.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 25233
+12.4%
RX 7700 XT 22444

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3080 53713
RX 7700 XT 57340
+6.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3080 91747
RX 7700 XT 126733
+38.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3080 39257
RX 7700 XT 42801
+9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3080 188064
RX 7700 XT 201871
+7.3%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3080 529548
RX 7700 XT 730434
+37.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD169
−11.8%
189
+11.8%
1440p127
+24.5%
102
−24.5%
4K86
+43.3%
60
−43.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.142.38
1440p5.504.40
4K8.137.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
−53.2%
193
+53.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
−22.2%
165
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 111
−62.2%
180
+62.2%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+14.2%
180−190
−14.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+6.4%
100−110
−6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 138
−14.5%
158
+14.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+5.5%
100−110
−5.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+14.4%
130−140
−14.4%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+4%
220−230
−4%
Hitman 3 116
−1.7%
110−120
+1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
+10.5%
210−220
−10.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−6.3%
150−160
+6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+14.9%
110−120
−14.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 270−280
+17.3%
230−240
−17.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 248
+68.7%
140−150
−68.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
−101%
272
+101%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 96
−55.2%
149
+55.2%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+14.2%
180−190
−14.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+6.4%
100−110
−6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 134
+1.5%
132
−1.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+5.5%
100−110
−5.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+14.4%
130−140
−14.4%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+4%
220−230
−4%
Hitman 3 118
+0%
110−120
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
+10.5%
210−220
−10.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−6.3%
150−160
+6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+5.3%
110−120
−5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 326
−2.5%
334
+2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+15.8%
120−130
−15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 238
+61.9%
140−150
−61.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+11.6%
121
−11.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
−50%
132
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+6.4%
100−110
−6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 131
+7.4%
122
−7.4%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+5.5%
100−110
−5.5%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0.9%
231
−0.9%
Hitman 3 110
−7.3%
110−120
+7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 182
−18.7%
216
+18.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 287
+0%
287
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
−12.8%
168
+12.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 101
−45.5%
140−150
+45.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+14.9%
110−120
−14.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+21.8%
120−130
−21.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+14.4%
90−95
−14.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−28.9%
98
+28.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
−32.9%
101
+32.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+13.2%
65−70
−13.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+7.5%
80
−7.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+14.9%
65−70
−14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%
Hitman 3 112
+38.3%
80−85
−38.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 151
−13.2%
171
+13.2%
Metro Exodus 107
−25.2%
134
+25.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 219
+13.5%
193
−13.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
−3.4%
120
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 247
+7.9%
220−230
−7.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 130
+32.7%
95−100
−32.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+20.4%
50−55
−20.4%
Hitman 3 57
+16.3%
45−50
−16.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+2.8%
210−220
−2.8%
Metro Exodus 142
+69%
80−85
−69%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+29.2%
89
−29.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−9.4%
58
+9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
−13.5%
59
+13.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+19.4%
36
−19.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−24.1%
134
+24.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135
+39.2%
97
−39.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+58.8%
30−35
−58.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95
+66.7%
55−60
−66.7%

This is how RTX 3080 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 43% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3080 is 69% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 101% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is ahead in 47 tests (65%)
  • RX 7700 XT is ahead in 23 tests (32%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.41 58.18
Recency 1 September 2020 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 245 Watt

RTX 3080 has a 12.4% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 30.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7700 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5949 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1429 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.