RTX A4500 vs GeForce RTX 3070

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
57.98
+3.3%

RTX 3070 outperforms RTX A4500 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3845
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.50no data
Power efficiency19.0120.26
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58887168
Core clock speed1500 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate317.4369.6
Floating-point processing power20.31 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs184224
Tensor Cores184224
Ray Tracing Cores4656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 57.98
+3.3%
RTX A4500 56.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 22371
+3.2%
RTX A4500 21668

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 3070 122976
RTX A4500 141837
+15.3%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 3070 123782
RTX A4500 132236
+6.8%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

RTX 3070 149734
RTX A4500 171509
+14.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD148
+5.7%
140−150
−5.7%
1440p101
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
4K64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 147
+5%
140−150
−5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+5.3%
95−100
−5.3%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+8.2%
170−180
−8.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
+6.9%
130−140
−6.9%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+6.7%
210−220
−6.7%
Hitman 3 109
+9%
100−105
−9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+4.8%
210−220
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 144
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
+5.9%
220−230
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 174
+8.8%
160−170
−8.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+8.8%
80−85
−8.8%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+8.2%
170−180
−8.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
+5%
120−130
−5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+6.7%
210−220
−6.7%
Hitman 3 116
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+4.8%
210−220
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 144
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 255
+6.3%
240−250
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+10%
110−120
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 178
+4.7%
170−180
−4.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
+8%
75−80
−8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+7.4%
95−100
−7.4%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+6.7%
210−220
−6.7%
Hitman 3 111
+11%
100−105
−11%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
+6.5%
170−180
−6.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 223
+6.2%
210−220
−6.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
+10%
110−120
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+4.2%
120−130
−4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+4.2%
260−270
−4.2%
Hitman 3 96
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 146
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%
Metro Exodus 101
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+3.8%
160−170
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 175
+9.4%
160−170
−9.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Hitman 3 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+3.8%
210−220
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 107
+7%
100−105
−7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%

This is how RTX 3070 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 6% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 6% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.98 56.15
Recency 1 September 2020 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 200 Watt

RTX 3070 has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 10% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A4500.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10850 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 190 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.