RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 with RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
57.98

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 3070 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4231
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.60no data
Power efficiency18.0719.10
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58884096
Core clock speed1500 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate317.4no data
Floating-point processing power20.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs184no data
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 57.98
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 62.69
+8.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 22342
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 24158
+8.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 43005
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+20.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 31020
+2%
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RTX 3070 188
+1.3%
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 186

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RTX 3070 76
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 213
+180%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RTX 3070 13
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 300
+2245%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RTX 3070 115
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 252
+120%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RTX 3070 61
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 199
+227%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RTX 3070 44
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 135
+208%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RTX 3070 160
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 163
+1.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RTX 3070 13
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 31
+138%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD149
−7.4%
160−170
+7.4%
1440p99
−1%
100−110
+1%
4K61
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.35no data
1440p5.04no data
4K8.18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 147
−2%
150−160
+2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
−4%
130−140
+4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100−105
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−3.3%
190−200
+3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
−7.9%
150−160
+7.9%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−7.1%
150−160
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−7.1%
240−250
+7.1%
Hitman 3 109
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−4.5%
230−240
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 118
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
−7.3%
250−260
+7.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 174
−3.4%
180−190
+3.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−3.4%
90−95
+3.4%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−3.3%
190−200
+3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
−3.2%
130−140
+3.2%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−7.1%
150−160
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−7.1%
240−250
+7.1%
Hitman 3 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−4.5%
230−240
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−4.2%
150−160
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 255
−5.9%
270−280
+5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−7.4%
130−140
+7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 178
−6.7%
190−200
+6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
−7.8%
110−120
+7.8%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−7.1%
240−250
+7.1%
Hitman 3 111
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
−5%
190−200
+5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 223
−7.6%
240−250
+7.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
−7.4%
130−140
+7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−4%
130−140
+4%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−7%
290−300
+7%
Hitman 3 96
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 146
−2.7%
150−160
+2.7%
Metro Exodus 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
−2.4%
170−180
+2.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−2%
100−105
+2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 175
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
−5.5%
230−240
+5.5%
Metro Exodus 107
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%

This is how RTX 3070 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 1% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.98 62.69
Recency 1 September 2020 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 225 Watt

RTX 3070 has 2.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 8.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11303 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.