RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3070

Place in the ranking	39	93
Place by popularity	38	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	59.31	no data
Power efficiency	18.25	25.51
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5888	4608
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	17,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	317.4	no data
Floating-point processing power	20.31 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	96	no data
TMUs	184	no data
Tensor Cores	184	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	46	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	242 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 57.97
+36.9%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 42.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 22367
+36.8%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16345

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 43005
+49.1%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 28847

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 31020
+50.8%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20571

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 154864
+87.5%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	148 +48%	100−110 −48%
1440p	101 +44.3%	70−75 −44.3%
4K	64 +42.2%	45−50 −42.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.37	no data
1440p	4.94	no data
4K	7.80	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

147
+47%

100−105

−47%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	125 +38.9%	90−95 −38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 +42.9%	70−75 −42.9%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +41.5%	130−140 −41.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +45.3%	75−80 −45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	139 +39%	100−105 −39%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +37.5%	80−85 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +40%	100−105 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +40%	160−170 −40%
Hitman 3	109 +45.3%	75−80 −45.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +37.5%	160−170 −37.5%
Metro Exodus	144 +44%	100−105 −44%
Red Dead Redemption 2	118 +38.8%	85−90 −38.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 +37.1%	170−180 −37.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	174 +45%	120−130 −45%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +41.2%	85−90 −41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	87 +45%	60−65 −45%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +41.5%	130−140 −41.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +45.3%	75−80 −45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	126 +40%	90−95 −40%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +37.5%	80−85 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +40%	100−105 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +40%	160−170 −40%
Hitman 3	116 +45%	80−85 −45%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +37.5%	160−170 −37.5%
Metro Exodus	144 +44%	100−105 −44%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +42.5%	80−85 −42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	255 +41.7%	180−190 −41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +42.4%	85−90 −42.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	178 +36.9%	130−140 −36.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	81 +47.3%	55−60 −47.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +45.3%	75−80 −45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	102 +45.7%	70−75 −45.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +37.5%	80−85 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +40%	160−170 −40%
Hitman 3	111 +38.8%	80−85 −38.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	181 +39.2%	130−140 −39.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	223 +39.4%	160−170 −39.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	121 +42.4%	85−90 −42.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85 +41.7%	60−65 −41.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

116

+45%

80−85
−45%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +38.9%	90−95 −38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +38.5%	65−70 −38.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +38%	50−55 −38%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +42.6%	190−200 −42.6%
Hitman 3	96 +37.1%	70−75 −37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	146 +46%	100−105 −46%
Metro Exodus	101 +44.3%	70−75 −44.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	166 +38.3%	120−130 −38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +40%	70−75 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	175 +45.8%	120−130 −45.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

114

+42.5%

80−85
−42.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Hitman 3	52 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +45.3%	150−160 −45.3%
Metro Exodus	107 +42.7%	75−80 −42.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90 +38.5%	65−70 −38.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +36.9%	65−70 −36.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	97 +38.6%	70−75 −38.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

69
+38%

50−55

−38%

This is how RTX 3070 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 is 48% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 is 44% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 is 42% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	57.97	42.36
Recency	1 September 2020	21 March 2023
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 3070 has a 36.9% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 91.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.