Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile with Radeon 680M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
46.59
+192%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 680M by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.2323.06
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Rembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5632768
Core clock speed915 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate248.2105.6
Floating-point processing power15.88 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs17648
Tensor Cores176no data
Ray Tracing Cores4412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 46.59
+192%
Radeon 680M 15.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17978
+192%
Radeon 680M 6166

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 81895
+137%
Radeon 680M 34600

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 36970
+256%
Radeon 680M 10371

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 27776
+305%
Radeon 680M 6865

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 141689
+228%
Radeon 680M 43225

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 581927
+61.7%
Radeon 680M 359776

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 10462
+354%
Radeon 680M 2303

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+219%
37
−219%
1440p73
+306%
18
−306%
4K48
+336%
11
−336%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 129
+231%
39
−231%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+128%
35−40
−128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107
+182%
38
−182%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+137%
55−60
−137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+283%
29
−283%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+117%
40−45
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+119%
45−50
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+80%
110−120
−80%
Hitman 3 117
+266%
32
−266%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+100%
85−90
−100%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+104%
45−50
−104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+174%
55−60
−174%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+55.3%
85−90
−55.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+128%
35−40
−128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 89
+187%
31
−187%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+137%
55−60
−137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+324%
21
−324%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+117%
40−45
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+119%
45−50
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+80%
110−120
−80%
Hitman 3 113
+277%
30
−277%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+100%
85−90
−100%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+104%
45−50
−104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 202
+330%
47
−330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+55.3%
85−90
−55.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+128%
35−40
−128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+189%
27
−189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+376%
17
−376%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+117%
40−45
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+80%
110−120
−80%
Hitman 3 100
+270%
27
−270%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+300%
43
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 178
+345%
40
−345%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+329%
24
−329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+278%
18
−278%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+104%
45−50
−104%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+148%
30−35
−148%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+307%
14−16
−307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+158%
18−20
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+355%
11
−355%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+145%
20−22
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+147%
90−95
−147%
Hitman 3 69
+245%
20−22
−245%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+163%
35−40
−163%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+144%
30−35
−144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 137
+407%
27
−407%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+265%
17
−265%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+90.5%
100−110
−90.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+148%
27−30
−148%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+153%
16−18
−153%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+177%
12−14
−177%
Hitman 3 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+112%
85−90
−112%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+206%
18−20
−206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+485%
13
−485%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
+350%
8−9
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+550%
4
−550%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
+479%
14
−479%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
+314%
7−8
−314%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 219% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 306% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 336% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Ti Mobile surpassed Radeon 680M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.59 15.98
Recency 4 January 2022 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile has a 191.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 130% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon 680M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 849 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 924 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.