Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
32.58
+31.8%

RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168223
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Power efficiency27.9118.81
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401792
Core clock speed900 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate171.0227.8
Floating-point processing power10.94 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs120112
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores3028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Mobile 32.58
+31.8%
Pro W6600M 24.71

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Mobile 12550
+31.8%
Pro W6600M 9521

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+40%
70−75
−40%
1440p66
+32%
50−55
−32%
4K40
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 103
+71.7%
60−65
−71.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−7.1%
75−80
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−7.5%
110−120
+7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−7.6%
70−75
+7.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+43.3%
60−65
−43.3%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−6.8%
75−80
+6.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−7.3%
85−90
+7.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−4.6%
180−190
+4.6%
Hitman 3 106
+43.2%
70−75
−43.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−5.6%
150−160
+5.6%
Metro Exodus 164
+41.4%
110−120
−41.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−9.6%
120−130
+9.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−7.1%
75−80
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−7.5%
110−120
+7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−7.6%
70−75
+7.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+15%
60−65
−15%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−6.8%
75−80
+6.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−7.3%
85−90
+7.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−4.6%
180−190
+4.6%
Hitman 3 108
+45.9%
70−75
−45.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 189
+26%
150−160
−26%
Metro Exodus 129
+11.2%
110−120
−11.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 102
+20%
85−90
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+25.4%
120−130
−25.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−7.4%
70−75
+7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 158
+29.5%
120−130
−29.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−7.1%
75−80
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−7.6%
70−75
+7.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−6.8%
75−80
+6.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−4.6%
180−190
+4.6%
Hitman 3 96
+29.7%
70−75
−29.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
−25%
150−160
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
+11.1%
120−130
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
+6.8%
70−75
−6.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
−165%
120−130
+165%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−8.1%
65−70
+8.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−8.6%
35−40
+8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+26.3%
35−40
−26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+50%
24−27
−50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−7%
200−210
+7%
Hitman 3 64
+45.5%
40−45
−45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 85
+28.8%
65−70
−28.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+21.7%
80−85
−21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−11.4%
45−50
+11.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 116
−54.3%
170−180
+54.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−11.5%
27−30
+11.5%
Hitman 3 41
+46.4%
27−30
−46.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−5.6%
160−170
+5.6%
Metro Exodus 60
+39.5%
40−45
−39.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−9.5%
21−24
+9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−10%
21−24
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%

This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 40% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 32% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3060 Mobile is 72% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 165% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (44%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 40 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.58 24.71
Recency 12 January 2021 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 90 Watt

RTX 3060 Mobile has a 31.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5026 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.