RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	205	33
Place by popularity	90	not in top-100
Power efficiency	24.37	27.65
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	7424
Core clock speed	735 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1035 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,250 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	82.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.299 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	80	no data
Tensor Cores	80	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	20	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.28

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.65
+127%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10143

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23017
+127%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	75 −127%	170−180 +127%
1440p	43 −121%	95−100 +121%
4K	27 −122%	60−65 +122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

62
−126%

140−150

+126%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −117%	130−140 +117%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −120%	180−190 +120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −116%	110−120 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 −120%	130−140 +120%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −124%	130−140 +124%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −105%	300−310 +105%
Hitman 3	80 −125%	180−190 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −126%	260−270 +126%
Metro Exodus	143 −110%	300−310 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 −124%	220−230 +124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −124%	190−200 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	231 −116%	500−550 +116%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 −114%	75−80 +114%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −120%	180−190 +120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −116%	110−120 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 −122%	100−105 +122%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −124%	130−140 +124%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −105%	300−310 +105%
Hitman 3	77 −121%	170−180 +121%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −126%	260−270 +126%
Metro Exodus	114 −119%	250−260 +119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	78 −118%	170−180 +118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	105 −119%	230−240 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	203 −122%	450−500 +122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 −112%	55−60 +112%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −116%	110−120 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 −125%	90−95 +125%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −124%	130−140 +124%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −105%	300−310 +105%
Hitman 3	67 −124%	150−160 +124%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 −117%	200−210 +117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90 −122%	200−210 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 −120%	110−120 +120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	28 −114%	60−65 +114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

81
−122%

180−190

+122%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −113%	100−105 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −124%	85−90 +124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 −112%	55−60 +112%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −105%	45−50 +105%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −124%	65−70 +124%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −110%	300−310 +110%
Hitman 3	46 −117%	100−105 +117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	69 −117%	150−160 +117%
Metro Exodus	60 −117%	130−140 +117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 −113%	130−140 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −126%	70−75 +126%
Watch Dogs: Legion	139 −116%	300−310 +116%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

56
−114%

120−130

+114%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Hitman 3	20 −125%	45−50 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −127%	290−300 +127%
Metro Exodus	47 −113%	100−105 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 −124%	65−70 +124%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 −110%	21−24 +110%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −121%	75−80 +121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	34 −121%	75−80 +121%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 −110%	21−24 +110%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−124%

65−70
+124%

This is how RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 127% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 121% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 122% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.28	59.65
Recency	11 May 2021	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 127% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.